New 666 Surveillance Post: Digital Cash Tested by Wall Street in Secret Meeting
The 666 Surveillance System
Revelation 13:16-18 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six (666).
There are 9 articles and three videos in this 666 Surveillance System post, with two of them copied below, along with the Commentary.
We’ve known for years that a cashless society is coming, and there have been many indications recently that it’s very close – from biometric scans at grocery stores to the move toward cards with chips to implants in the human body. All of these technological advances are preparing us for a world without cash.
There are numerous “official” reasons given for the move: the inability of criminals to launder money, the end to cheating on taxes, the safety of people who no longer will be preyed upon by criminals if they aren’t carrying cash, and many more. But in the end, the real reason isn’t one they’re promoting in official circles – and that’s the ability to track and control everyone through the use of digital currency. As the late producer Aaron Russo makes clear in this interview with Alex Jones, which occurred shortly before his death, this is the ultimate plan for control of everyone. The full interview, along with videos about his death, are available on YouTube.
If you read or watch nothing else in this post, make certain that you view this short video where he explains the end-game for the elites in charge, as told directly to him by one of those elites, Nick Rockefeller (pictured above with Russo). As we’ve said all along, this is the perfect man/mousetrap where everything you do is monitored, and everything you need to live is controlled. It’s the heart of the coming 666 Beast System of the Antichrist, as the Bible explains in Revelation 13, quoted above.
If you read the articles and watch the videos below, you’ll find it’s right at the door and that the preparations and tests for it are being made in secret. But for a leak by Bloomberg News, we wouldn’t even be aware of how far it already has progressed or what the final form may entail, in terms of how it ultimately will work.
It won’t last long, because the agenda and system behind it won’t be here for long. If you read Revelation you’ll find that in a few short years Christ will return and destroy this system. It may even crumble before then, as the Antichrist gains full control and replaces this agenda with a similar one of his own. But it will be in place long enough that everyone should be concerned, and find refuge in the only source possible, which is within the protection of Jesus Christ.
Revelation 17:12-14 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.
New Digital Cash System Being Prepared In Secret? This is an important development and because of that, both this article and the next (which explains how the process works) are something you should read. While it’s reported that Bloomberg “leaked” the information, it’s difficult to know whether this was an intentional move that was orchestrated or whether it really was something that was intended to be kept secret.
“Last month, a “secret meeting” that involved more than 100 executives from some of the biggest financial institutions in the United States was held in New York City.
During this “secret meeting”, a company known as “Chain” unveiled a technology that transforms U.S. dollars into “pure digital assets”. Reportedly, there were representatives from Nasdaq, Citigroup, Visa, Fidelity, Fiserv and Pfizer in the room, and Chain also claims to be partnering with Capital One, State Street, and First Data.
This “revolutionary” technology is intended to completely change the way that we use money, and it would represent a major step toward a cashless society. But if this new digital cash system is going to be so good for society, why was it unveiled during a secret meeting for Wall Street bankers? Is there something more going on here than we are being told?
None of us probably would have ever heard about this secret meeting if it was not for a report in Bloomberg. The following comes from their article entitled “Inside the Secret Meeting Where Wall Street Tested Digital Cash”…
While cash in a bank account moves electronically all the time today, there’s a distinction between that system and what it means to say money is digital. Electronic payments are really just messages that cash needs to move from one account to another, and this reconciliation is what adds time to the payments process. For customers, moving money between accounts can take days as banks wait for confirmations. Digital dollars, however, are pre-loaded into a system like a blockchain. From there, they can be swapped immediately for an asset.
“Instead of a record or message being moved, it’s the actual asset,” Ludwin said. “The payment and the settlement become the same thing.”
“With everyone from ivory tower academics to sin-street hookers proclaiming the need for and benefits of a “war on cash” to save the world from criminals and tax-evaders (oh yeah and to stop NIRP-driven savers from hording cash and crushing central planners’ dreams), it is perhaps shocking that Bundesbank board member Carl-Ludwig Thiele warned at an event this week that the attempt to abolish and criminalize cash is out of line with freedom. He said that citizens should continue to decide how and in what form they want to use their money.
While Kyle Bass warned that
“I think this is where the academics are kind of clashing with the practitioners. I think on paper negative rates make a lot of sense if you’re running academic models, but in reality they make no sense. Having seven or eight trillion dollars of debt trading at negative rates, having thirty year JGB’s trading at fifty basis points is absolutely ludicrous. This experiment that’s going on we all know will end poorly at some point in time, I just don’t know when that time is.”
“I think that one of the fears that they have is a run on cash. If they told you and I that they’re going to tax your deposits by a hundred basis points, well it’s better to put it in a safe or under your mattress. And that’s why you see a resurgence in gold. The more they move to negative rates, the more gold is gonna take off because there’s no carrying cost.”
Perhaps Buba’s Thiele is more concerned about the longer-term social unrest that a war on cash will unleash – as opposed to the short-term monetary planners’ “whatever it takes”-ism of today. As Martin Armstrong summarizes, Thiele’s main arguments were:
Every citizen has the right, with his money to proceed as he wants. If action is taken at this point in the right to freedom of the citizen, it must be well-grounded. And so the question arises: How does a cash limit restrict crime in other countries? Thiele said he was not aware of any support where a cash limit, such as Italy or France, prevents crime. Crime should be correspondingly lower than in countries with no upper limit on cash, but that is simply not the case.
The arguments that are made against cash and cash payments, are unconvincing, Thiele said. He went on to argue that cash protects the privacy of the population. That benefit is not a reason to twist into a benefit for criminal ignoring the majority of honest citizens. The right to informational self-determination and respect for private life is a valuable asset which should not be watered down or abandoned. “Cash is coined liberty” – this modified Dostoevsky quote has not lost any of its validity.”